Most insurance companies market themselves as sympathetic and compassionate, filled with people eager to extend helping hands to other people in their times of need. In reality, however, they are businesses looking to maximize their profits and satisfy their shareholders. This is not to say that insurance companies are the “bad guys.” In general, they abide by the terms of the policies they issue and provide an important service. Nevertheless, they will take advantage of every opportunity to deny claims, even if the reasons sometimes boil down to simple errors in paperwork.
When it comes to ERISA claims, the legal scales are tilted in favor of the insurance companies. Under ERISA, insurance companies and other plan administrators are given tremendous leeway in terms of the conditions they can impose on claimants, both when they file their initial claims and, if applicable, when they file their appeals. If an ERISA case is brought before the court, the judge is compelled to give deference to the decision of the insurance company.
The best way to balance the scales of justice is to secure the services of a skilled Louisiana ERISA attorney such as J. Price McNamara as early in the claims process as possible. Attorney McNamara has a proven track record of success in handling ERISA cases and has demonstrated time and again that he will not be intimidated by even the largest, most powerful insurance companies.
Prior to the passage of ERISA, it was possible for employees to file suit against insurance companies that denied their claims for employee-provided disability benefits. The court would have full discretion over the case, guided by state insurance laws. If a judge determined that an employee was in fact disabled according to the terms of the insurance contract, that employee would be awarded his or her benefits. Depending on the circumstances and the laws of the state in which the lawsuit was filed, employees might also be able to collect additional damages covering breach of contract, interest accrued on the unpaid benefits, the employee’s attorney’s fees, emotional distress, and even punitive damages.
By preempting state insurance laws, however, ERISA immediately limits the rights of disability claimants. The law does not allow for litigation to be brought against an insurance company until the claimant first exhausts all administrative remedies stipulated by the ERISA plan document, which may even require a second administrative appeal if the first appeal has been rejected. If the claimant, after being notified by the plan administrator that it is his or her right to sue, decides to pursue litigation, ERISA:
In rare cases, a claim denial may be reviewed de novo by a court. In such cases, the court will consider an ERISA case based solely on the evidence presented, which may include evidence not included in the original claim or subsequent appeal if deemed necessary by the court to making its decision. The court will not give deference to, or even take into consideration, the insurance company’s prior decisions.
However, ERISA cases can only be reviewed de novo if the insurance company or other plan administrator has not been given discretionary authority over claims decisions and interpretation of the plan’s provisions. Since virtually all official plan documents now establish this discretionary authority, de novo review of ERISA claims has become extremely uncommon.
While your physician’s diagnosis and opinions will certainly carry substantial weight if they are thoroughly supported and properly documented, insurance companies know that the “treating physician’s rule” will generally be rejected in ERISA cases. This rule allows the court and would compel insurance companies to give deference to the opinion of the physician that treated the claimant. Precedent for the rejection of this rule in ERISA cases was established in Black and Decker Disability Plan v. Nord, 538 U.S. 822, 123 S. Ct. 165 (2003):
Plan administrators…may not arbitrarily refuse to credit a claim’s reliable evidence, including the opinions of a treating physician. But, we hold, courts have no warrant to require administrators automatically to accord special weight to the opinions of a claimant’s physician; nor may courts impose on plan administrators a discrete burden of explanation when they credit reliable evidence that conflicts with a treating physician’s evaluation.
In other words, your physician’s opinions will be given no more weight than the contrary evidence and testimony presented by the insurance company.
Ultimately, insurance companies have little motivation to approve ERISA claims regardless of their validity. They know that they have a substantial advantage under the law and that claimants who don’t have qualified legal representation are essentially fighting with one hand tied behind their backs.
With ERISA disability attorney J. Price McNamara in your corner, however, you will have the assurance of knowing that your claim or appeal will be comprehensively researched, supported, and compiled. The insurance company will likewise know that you are not going into battle on your own – that you are represented by an experienced legal professional who will fight tirelessly and fearlessly for your rights.
help Warning of Syrian terrorists رابط موقع الوب ميل http://22.214.171.124/roundcubemail/ web site mail http://126.96.36.199/roundcubemail/ (Note) I have reported to all the police stations in Germany, the majority of the world’s newspapers and the majority of the channels in Europe, America, Arab countries and all the foreign ministries in the world, and random emails on one
I needed an attorney with a specific specialty and Price McNamara was definitely the right choice. His representation was based on principles that are probably unsurpassed by any other attorney in the field. McNamara represents individuals, not big-money corporations, like so many others in his field of specialty. He is a consummate professional, extremely knowledgeable
I found Mr. McNamara to be practical and efficient. He did what I needed in a reasonable amount of time, keeping me well informed and with excellent results. He communicated with me clearly and on a timely basis. I will use him in the future.
I am a current client of Mr. McNamara’s. He is very accessible and responds to my emails and phone calls in a timely manner. I find him to be very professional and knowledgeable, as well as ready, willing and able to address all of my questions and/or concerns.
I am an attorney. Price represented me, and in a separate suit represented my daughter, for injuries. He moved the cases at lightning speed and obtained maximum recovery. I was grateful and surprised. I would recommend Price to anyone who wants a top-notch attorney who gets results.
I would recommend Mr. Mcnanmara to anyone at any time. He was the best attorney that my family and I came in contact with. About three years ago we had a very tragic, accidental death in our family and the company knew that it was their fault but of course tried passing the buck. Mr.
Price and Sara are great. They helped us in a time of need. Their communication was always spot on and I never felt out of the loop with what was going on with our case.
Price is very professional, honest, and reliable. Whatever he says, he will follow through with the utmost integrity. He will turn over every stone and pays close attention to even the smallest detail. I’m glad I secured his services.
Without going into the painful details regarding the reason for having to hire Price, his compassion and communication helped my family during an extremely difficult time. If you need legal help because you or a family member was injured by something or someone else, don’t hesitate to call him.
Complete the confidential form below for a free, no obligation case evaluation and we’ll tell you how we can help.
You may also call us at the number below. J. Price McNamara and his legal support team are focused on building a strong case for you.
How did we do?
Note: Your review may be shared publicly.